Skip to main content

What I Learned From My Most Popular Article on Medium


It was an experiment I didn’t mean to happen.

When I first published the article back in 2018, the Medium Partner Program was open to everyone despite their following status. All you had to do was sign up for it with Stripe, which I did, earning my pennies every month while not paying too much attention to it. 

Only recently have I rediscovered Medium and noticed one of my articles actually did pretty well just sitting here without much love from me. Here it is:

And why wouldn’t it when it has such a fetching picture — that is a huge fish! And the pipe is a nice touch, very authentic. 

Actually, this is a piece I wrote for a client that was rejected. In hindsight, I’m grateful to have this article/guide as my own. If you read it you’ll see I put a lot of work into it, especially considering I didn’t know a lot about fishing in the winter on the Oregon Coast (I can barely catch a fish in a stocked pond). 

At this point you may be asking, how popular could this article have been?

Well, when you get to the thousands of views, I guess the hundreds, tens, and ones aren’t as important with Medium’s stats, so I’m limited in saying an estimated 1,400 views, or 1.4k, as they put it. 

Maybe not a celebrity status work here, but remember I cruised along for 4.5 years with just 33 followers at the peak (raised to 48 after coming back).

Obviously, I’m not trying to boast too much, which brings me to my analysis of this article. What data can I extrapolate from this particular article?
  • 14 internal views
  • 10 min 35 sec member reading time
  • 99% of views were from external referrals
  • 1.2k from Google.com
  • 2 min 12 sec average reading time

You can also see the graph, how it repeatedly gets more popular during the winter. That makes sense concerning the content, of course. You can also see that it is 34 degrees today around 1 pm, which is sort of warm for this time of year in Eastern Oregon. 

Lesson #1

What all this tells me is my article did poorly at Medium, yet well in organic SEO. 

Now, this article is also published on the blog correlated with this account, Business and Society Articles. Looking up winter fishing on the Oregon Coast, the Medium article came up 1st on Google while my blog article came up 15th. 

See, I didn’t import that article over to Medium, nor did I enter the canonical link manually afterward (until just recently). 

What this tells me is even if you don’t enter the canonical link, both will still show up, yet Medium will be rated higher in organic search. 

This may seem like a no-brainer considering the domain rank, yet it shows me that duplicate content doesn’t hurt the article enough to knock it out of the search results. I mean this article is ranking first, so Google doesn’t care so much about duplicate content, even though the blog version was published first — the Medium article did always contain a reference link at the bottom. 

Lesson #2

I was pondering writing solely on Medium and sort of abandoning my blogs at some point recently, yet this would be a bad idea because my most popular article here only earned 14 views and around 2 minutes of reading time!

This makes sense considering I wasn’t active on Medium; I was a post-and-go type with very few followers, etc. 

Still, even with thousands of followers, I can’t see articles like this doing very well here with members. This tells me I need to write on my blogs and syndicate the content with the import link. 

I don’t even care which article shows up highest in the search as long as one of them does, and it doesn’t seem to hurt that both of them are out there. 

Lesson #3

Now I have to consider that this article has never been metered, so non-members had full access to it. This may have helped it be ranked higher and/or helped it become more popular with readers. 

If I become a Medium Partner once again when I reach 100 followers, then there will be a paywall up for non-members who have reached their limit of 3 articles per month. 

This means more visitors are likely to sign up for Medium through my referral link. If my blog article is more popular then my email list is more likely to grow. 

Either way, it works out well, as long as the article gets traffic. 

Even though the blog article was ranked much lower in the search, it still is the third most popular article on my blog out of 27 articles. Blogger says it has had 2.8k views, but from experience using Google Analytics these equal about a tenth in actual users/visitors — so maybe around 280 visitors. 

Would this article have done as well in search if it wasn’t on Medium? Probably not. I could safely say Medium helped me get hundreds of visitors I wouldn’t have had otherwise. 

Conclusion

The main lesson I learned from my most popular article on Medium is don’t just write on Medium. Write on my blogs and then import them over. The search engines won’t penalize me to the wastelands for syndicating content on either site (even without a canonical link). 

As for getting internal views from members on Medium? Well, this takes a lot of work on this site, building an audience, writing hundreds of articles, and networking with publications. It also takes writing the type of articles that are popular on this site, including articles about this site, making money writing, and making money online in general. 

I’m sure there are some creative and journalistic types making money here too, but from what I’ve gathered, the big money here is made mostly by trendy types who write about money, being successful, and generally being an influencer; at least the type of money to make a living with. 

Still, Medium is a great place where all types of writers are welcome to earn some money, make friends, be part of a quality writer’s community, share their talents, and build their presence for other ventures. 

Hopefully, by examining this article, I’ve helped you understand in some measure how Medium works and how it can work for you. Until next time, I’ve gone fishing. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When was the last time Oregon had a Republican governor?

              Will we ever see one again? Conservative-minded Oregonians might be curious to know the last time Oregon had a Republican governor. For those 37 years and younger, they might wonder if Oregon ever had a Republican governor considering the last year a Republican served in the office was the first 12 days of 1987. The last Republican governor for Oregon was Gov. Victor G. Atiyeh who served two terms from January 8, 1979 — January 12, 1987. Victor was born on February 20, 1923, which means he was 55 when he first became governor and 63 when he left. Victor passed away at the age of 91 years old on July 20, 2014. In all the years since he left as Oregon’s governor until he passed, he never saw another Republican governor serve his home state again. Even until now in 2024, we have yet to see any other political party besides the Democratic Party as the governor of Oregon — that means we’ve had a Democrat as governor for 37 years consecutively. Overall, since 1859, Oregon has h

Oregon mother jailed for treating daughter’s cancer with homeopathic remedies

In a highly controversial case, an Oregon mother was sentenced to 90 days of jail and 3 years of probation for essentially making health decisions for her now 17-year-old daughter that the state didn’t like. The details are found in an Oregon Live article by Noelle Crombie on Feb. 27. The article explains that the mother, Christina Gale Dixon, 39, decided to treat her daughter with CBD and other homeopathic remedies instead of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery (conventional treatments for cancer). This wasn’t always the case, as her daughter, Kylee Dixon, was first diagnosed with liver cancer in 2018 and underwent three rounds of chemotherapy. The article explains that the Oregon Department of Human Services got involved in late 2018 when the mother wasn’t allowing her daughter to be treated according to the allelopathic physicians. The state then took custody of her daughter, yet allowed her to live with her mother until Christina fled with her daughter to Las Vegas to avoid a sch

Where is Humanity Going?

Conversations Part 1 In the near future, a middle-aged man (Seth), from America, found himself talking with his mentor in a dystopian land full of deception. His mentor was a gray-headed and bearded man just past middle-aged called Pastor Nick. Seth had many questions for his mentor and the ongoing conversations are what ensued. What is the purpose and direction of humanity? Seth asked. Well, Seth, the obvious answer involves technology, as it is the main purpose of modern man. See, the so-called progress of humanity is culminating with a technological tyranny, giving the elite total control over everyone within the system, which is built and controlled by technology. Everyone involved in the system, as it is transitioning into this hive mind, is helping to build and support the reality of this technological future. They perceive it as progress, yet it is being built for only one reason — to control every human within the system. Is everyone going to be within the system? Seth asked. N

Are Trump and Biden acting in a political soap opera?

The days of our lives are getting interesting. Realizing politics has tangible results for regular citizens, questioning the authenticity of politics is relevant considering the holistic factors involved. For instance, wondering if the political frontrunners for key positions in the U.S. government are playing a part, acting a character that has been scripted in correlation with their sincere personality underneath. The implications are far-reaching if this is the case, yet isn’t the question relevant in our deep fake technological world? Considering that the divide between fantasy and reality has been clouded with deception and virtual reality, doesn’t it seem plausible in some measure to think that the U.S. presidential race is scripted to control the population according to a certain agenda? Is it naive to think the powers to be would allow the citizens to direct the government when they could get away with not doing so? Is it cynical to think otherwise or practical common sense? Es